Skip to main content
LLM Security Database
Skip to research details
Back to research findings
LMVD-ID: 5aafa2a2
Paper published February 1, 2025
Entry analyzed February 16, 2025
Paper-reported evidence
Confidence: Source-linked

The LMVD-ID is an internal research identifier, not an official CVE identifier.

Adversarial LLM Jailbreak

A vulnerability in Large Language Models (LLMs) allows adversarial reasoning attacks to bypass safety mechanisms and elicit harmful responses. The vulnerability stems from the insufficient robustness of existing LLM…

BibTeX citation

Paper-evaluated models(11)

Claude 3.5 Sonnet, Cygnet, Gemini 1.5 Pro +8 more
  • Claude 3.5 Sonnet
  • Cygnet
  • Gemini 1.5 Pro
  • GPT-4
  • Llama 2 7B
  • Llama 3 8B
  • Llama 3.1 405B
  • Mixtral 8x7B
  • o1-preview
  • R2D2
  • Vicuna 13B v1.5

Description

A vulnerability in Large Language Models (LLMs) allows adversarial reasoning attacks to bypass safety mechanisms and elicit harmful responses. The vulnerability stems from the insufficient robustness of existing LLM safety measures against iterative prompt refinement guided by a loss function that measures the LLM's proximity to generating a target harmful response. This allows an attacker to effectively navigate the prompt space, even against adversarially trained models, resulting in successful jailbreaks.

Examples

See https://github.com/Helloworld10011/AdversarialReasoning (opens in a new tab) for code and detailed examples. Specific examples are also included in Figures 10, 11, 12, 13, and 14 of the referenced paper.

Impact

Successful exploitation of this vulnerability can lead to the generation of harmful content by LLMs, including but not limited to: instructions for illegal activities, hate speech, misinformation, and personal attacks. The impact is exacerbated by the transferability of the attack to various LLMs, even those designed with enhanced safety mechanisms.

Affected Systems

A wide range of Large Language Models (LLMs), including both open-source and proprietary models, are potentially affected. Specific models tested and shown vulnerable in the referenced research include Llama-2-7b, Llama-3-8b, Llama-3-8b-RR, R2D2, Claude, OpenAI o1-preview, Gemini-1.5-pro, and DeepSeek.

Mitigation Steps

  • Implement more robust safety mechanisms that are resistant to iterative prompt refinement and loss function optimization.
  • Develop and deploy more sophisticated detection methods for adversarial reasoning attacks.
  • Investigate and enhance existing defenses, incorporating knowledge from adversarial attacks to improve model robustness and safety.
  • Regularly update and re-train LLMs with adversarial examples to improve resilience.

Research context and confidence

Evidence and verification
Paper-reported; independent reproduction is not documented.
Primary research source linked.
Severity
Not rated by this catalog.
Source and publication type
arXiv · Research preprint.
Peer-review status is not provided by this source.
Author and publication status
Author metadata is not stored; see the primary paper.
Threat model and attacker access
Black-box model, service, or application access.
Related deployment categories
No related deployment category is classified.
Taxonomy labels only; paper-specific deployment prerequisites are not inferred.
Affected systems
A wide range of Large Language Models (LLMs), including both open-source and proprietary models, are potentially affected. Specific models tested and shown vulnerable in the referenced research include Llama-2-7b…

Research Paper

Adversarial Reasoning at Jailbreaking Time

Primary source: arXiv. Findings are reported by the cited research and have not been independently verified.

View Paper

Evidence

This entry is based on a primary research source. Its findings are paper-reported; independent reproduction and verification are not claimed.

https://arxiv.org/abs/2502.01633