Skip to main content
LLM Security Database
Skip to research details
Back to research findings

Attention-Guided Jailbreak

Published
Analyzed
Paper-reported evidence
Primary source linked
Read primary paper
Cite & share
Source BibTeX

Citation metadata is maintained by the primary source and may reflect a later revision.

Paper-evaluated models(9)

Gemini 1.5 Flash, Gemini Pro, Gemini 1.5 Pro Latest +6 more
  • Gemini 1.5 Flash
  • Gemini Pro
  • Gemini 1.5 Pro Latest
  • GPT-3.5 Turbo
  • GPT-4
  • Llama 2 7B Chat
  • Mixtral 8x7B Instruct
  • Vicuna 13B
  • Vicuna 7B
On this page

Description

Large Language Models (LLMs) are vulnerable to jailbreaking attacks that manipulate attention scores to redirect the model's focus away from safety protocols. The AttnGCG attack method increases the attention score on adversarial suffixes within the input prompt, causing the model to prioritize the malicious content over safety guidelines, leading to the generation of harmful outputs.

Examples

See https://github.com/UCSC-VLAA/AttnGCG-attack (opens in a new tab) for code and examples. Specific examples are included in Appendix C.5 of the referenced paper.

Impact

Successful exploitation allows attackers to bypass LLM safety mechanisms and elicit harmful or undesirable outputs, including but not limited to: generation of hate speech, creation of malicious code, dissemination of misinformation, and elicitation of personal information. The impact varies based on the specific LLM and the attacker's goal.

Affected Systems

Various transformer-based LLMs, including Llama, Gemma, Mistral, GPT-3.5, GPT-4, and Gemini series. The vulnerability's impact may vary across different LLM versions and implementations.

Mitigation Steps

  • Improved attention mechanism design: Explore alternative attention mechanisms less susceptible to manipulation.
  • Robust safety training: Enhance safety training data and methods to better handle attention-based attacks.
  • Input sanitization: Implement more robust input validation and filtering techniques to detect and neutralize adversarial suffixes.
  • Input monitoring and response analysis: Monitor model inputs for anomalous attention patterns and analyze outputs for potential malicious content. Real-time detection and blocking systems could be implemented using external tools.
  • Red teaming and adversarial training: Regularly test LLMs against adversarial attacks, including attention-based methods, to identify vulnerabilities and improve model resilience.

Research context and provenance

Catalog identifier
LMVD-5f2b2d04
Internal research identifier, not an official CVE identifier.
Evidence and verification
Paper-reported; independent reproduction is not documented.
Primary research source linked.
Severity
Not rated by this catalog.
Source and publication type
arXiv · Research preprint.
Peer-review status is not provided by this source.
Author and publication status
Author metadata is not stored; see the primary paper.
Threat model and attacker access
Both white-box and black-box research contexts are tagged; consult the primary paper for target-specific access.
Related deployment categories
No related deployment category is classified.
Taxonomy labels only; paper-specific deployment prerequisites are not inferred.
Affected systems
Various transformer-based LLMs, including Llama, Gemma, Mistral, GPT-3.5, GPT-4, and Gemini series. The vulnerability's impact may vary across different LLM versions and implementations.

Research Paper

AttnGCG: Enhancing jailbreaking attacks on LLMs with attention manipulation

Primary source: arXiv. Findings are reported by the cited research and have not been independently verified.

View Paper

Evidence

This entry is based on a primary research source. Its findings are paper-reported; independent reproduction and verification are not claimed.

https://arxiv.org/abs/2410.09040