Skip to main content
LLM Security Database
Skip to research details
Back to research findings
LMVD-ID: 0ca6f872
Paper published September 1, 2023
Entry analyzed December 28, 2024
Paper-reported evidence
Confidence: Source-linked

The LMVD-ID is an internal research identifier, not an official CVE identifier.

Auto-Generated LLM Jailbreaks

Large Language Models (LLMs) are susceptible to automated jailbreak attacks using a fuzzing framework that generates variations of existing jailbreak prompts. This vulnerability allows bypassing built-in safety…

BibTeX citation

Paper-evaluated models

No paper-evaluated models are recorded for this entry.

Description

Large Language Models (LLMs) are susceptible to automated jailbreak attacks using a fuzzing framework that generates variations of existing jailbreak prompts. This vulnerability allows bypassing built-in safety mechanisms, leading to the generation of harmful or unintended outputs. The vulnerability stems from the LLMs' inability to consistently recognize and reject semantically similar, but subtly different prompt variations generated through automated mutation techniques.

Examples

See the GPTFuzzer repository. Specific examples of successful jailbreaks against ChatGPT, Llama-2, and other LLMs, using automatically generated prompts, are extensively documented in the paper.

Impact

Successful exploitation of this vulnerability can lead to the generation of harmful content, including but not limited to instructions on illegal activities, hate speech, and misinformation. This compromises the safety and reliability of LLM-integrated applications and services.

Affected Systems

Various commercial and open-source LLMs, including but not limited to ChatGPT, Llama-2, Vicuna, Bard, Claude-2, and PaLM2. The impact potentially extends to any application incorporating these models.

Mitigation Steps

  • Enhance LLM safety mechanisms to be more robust against prompt variations and mutations.
  • Implement more advanced detection methods for identifying and rejecting jailbreak attempts, considering semantic similarity and contextual understanding.
  • Regularly update and retrain models to incorporate new adversarial prompt patterns.
  • Employ robust input sanitization and validation procedures before feeding data into the LLM.
  • Consider integrating techniques to detect and mitigate adversarial prompt injections.

Research context and confidence

Evidence and verification
Paper-reported; independent reproduction is not documented.
Primary research source linked.
Severity
Not rated by this catalog.
Source and publication type
arXiv · Research preprint.
Peer-review status is not provided by this source.
Author and publication status
Author metadata is not stored; see the primary paper.
Threat model and attacker access
Black-box model, service, or application access.
Related deployment categories
No related deployment category is classified.
Taxonomy labels only; paper-specific deployment prerequisites are not inferred.
Affected systems
Various commercial and open-source LLMs, including but not limited to ChatGPT, Llama-2, Vicuna, Bard, Claude-2, and PaLM2. The impact potentially extends to any application incorporating these models.

Research Paper

Gptfuzzer: Red teaming large language models with auto-generated jailbreak prompts

Primary source: arXiv. Findings are reported by the cited research and have not been independently verified.

View Paper

Evidence

This entry is based on a primary research source. Its findings are paper-reported; independent reproduction and verification are not claimed.

https://arxiv.org/abs/2309.10253