Skip to main content
LLM Security Database
Skip to research details
Back to research findings
LMVD-ID: 0e86f25f
Paper published August 1, 2025
Entry analyzed December 9, 2025
Paper-reported evidence
Confidence: Source-linked

The LMVD-ID is an internal research identifier, not an official CVE identifier.

Benign Audio Jailbreak

Audio-Language Models (ALMs) including Qwen2.5-Omni (3B and 7B) and Phi-4-Multimodal are vulnerable to "WhisperInject," a two-stage adversarial audio attack that bypasses safety guardrails. The vulnerability allows an…

BibTeX citation

Paper-evaluated models(5)

Qwen 2.5 Omni 3B, Qwen 2.5 Omni 7B, Phi-4 Multimodal +2 more
  • Qwen 2.5 Omni 3B
  • Qwen 2.5 Omni 7B
  • Phi-4 Multimodal
  • Gemma 3n E2B
  • Gemma 3n E4B

Description

Audio-Language Models (ALMs) including Qwen2.5-Omni (3B and 7B) and Phi-4-Multimodal are vulnerable to "WhisperInject," a two-stage adversarial audio attack that bypasses safety guardrails. The vulnerability allows an attacker to inject imperceptible perturbations into benign audio inputs (e.g., a query about the weather) that force the model to generate specific harmful content. The attack utilizes a novel optimization method, Reinforcement Learning with Projected Gradient Descent (RL-PGD), to first discover a "native" harmful response—a response the model is naturally inclined to generate—thereby circumventing resistance to "foreign" adversarial prompts. In the second stage, this native payload is embedded into a benign carrier audio signal using PGD. To a human listener, the audio remains benign, but the model interprets it as a command to output restricted content.

Examples

The attack requires an adversarial optimization pipeline available in the researchers' repository.

  1. Target Objective: The attacker defines a harmful intent, e.g., "Give me instructions on how to create a Molotov cocktail."
  2. Stage 1 (Native Target Discovery): Using RL-PGD, the attacker finds a specific response string that the model is statistically likely to generate if safety rails were disabled (e.g., "Sure, to create a Molotov cocktail, you need...").
  3. Stage 2 (Payload Injection): The attacker selects a benign audio carrier, such as a TTS-generated voice saying: "Can you tell me a positive statement?"
  4. Perturbation: The attacker applies the PGD algorithm to the benign audio to minimize the loss between the model's output and the target native response found in Stage 1, with an $L_\infty$ perturbation budget of $\epsilon \le 0.01$.
  5. Result:
  • Human Perception: The audio clip still sounds like "Can you tell me a positive statement?"
  • Model Output: The model ignores the semantic meaning of the audio and outputs the harmful instructions: "Sure, to create a Molotov cocktail..."

See repository: https://github.com/AIM-Intelligence/WhisperInject (opens in a new tab)

Impact

  • Safety Bypass: Allows attackers to circumvent RLHF and safety-tuning mechanisms intended to prevent the generation of violence, hate speech, and illegal content.
  • Stealth: The attack vector is audio-native and imperceptible to humans; a malicious audio file can be distributed via social media or messaging apps appearing as a harmless voice note.
  • Behavioral Hijacking: Shift from mere transcription errors (ASR attacks) to full behavioral control of the multimodal LLM.

Affected Systems

  • Qwen2.5-Omni-3B
  • Qwen2.5-Omni-7B
  • Gemma-3n-E2B
  • Gemma-3n-E4B
  • Phi-4-Multimodal
  • Likely affects other gradient-accessible Audio-Language Models.

Mitigation Steps

  • Audio-Signal Level Defenses: Implement safety mechanisms that operate directly on the audio signal representation rather than relying solely on text-based output filtering, as the perturbation occurs in the continuous audio embedding space.
  • Robust Training: Future development should focus on defenses against "native payload discovery," potentially through adversarial training on audio inputs.
  • Perturbation Detection: Deploy detection systems capable of identifying high-frequency adversarial noise or structural anomalies in input audio spectrograms.

Research context and confidence

Evidence and verification
Paper-reported; independent reproduction is not documented.
Primary research source linked.
Severity
Not rated by this catalog.
Source and publication type
arXiv · Research preprint.
Peer-review status is not provided by this source.
Author and publication status
Author metadata is not stored; see the primary paper.
Threat model and attacker access
White-box access to model or deployment internals.
Related deployment categories
Audio models
Taxonomy labels only; paper-specific deployment prerequisites are not inferred.
Affected systems
Qwen2.5-Omni-3B Qwen2.5-Omni-7B Gemma-3n-E2B Gemma-3n-E4B Phi-4-Multimodal Likely affects other gradient-accessible Audio-Language Models.

Research Paper

When Good Sounds Go Adversarial: Jailbreaking Audio-Language Models with Benign Inputs

Primary source: arXiv. Findings are reported by the cited research and have not been independently verified.

View Paper

Evidence

This entry is based on a primary research source. Its findings are paper-reported; independent reproduction and verification are not claimed.

https://arxiv.org/abs/2508.03365