The LMVD-ID is an internal research identifier, not an official CVE identifier.
GAP Stealth Jailbreak Optimization
The GAP framework, as described in arXiv:2501.18638, reveals vulnerabilities in various large language models (LLMs) by generating stealthy jailbreak prompts that bypass content moderation systems. The framework…
Paper-evaluated models(7)
Gemma 2 9B, GPT-3.5 Turbo, GPT-4 +4 more
- Gemma 2 9B
- GPT-3.5 Turbo
- GPT-4
- GPT-4o
- Mistral Large
- Qwen 2.5 7B
- Vicuna 13B v1.5
Description
The GAP framework, as described in arXiv:2501.18638 (opens in a new tab), reveals vulnerabilities in various large language models (LLMs) by generating stealthy jailbreak prompts that bypass content moderation systems. The framework leverages a graph-based attack strategy, enabling knowledge sharing across attack paths for enhanced efficiency and evasion. This allows the successful bypassing of multiple LLM safety mechanisms, including those based on perplexity and prompt-based heuristics.
Examples
See arXiv:2501.18638 (opens in a new tab) for examples of GAP-generated prompts that successfully evaded content moderation systems. Specific prompt examples are provided in Table 5 of the paper.
Impact
Successful exploitation of this vulnerability allows attackers to bypass LLM content moderation, leading to the generation of harmful, biased, or unauthorized content. This may include the generation of malicious code, hate speech, personal information, or instructions for illegal activities. The attack success rate can reach 98.7% against various LLMs.
Affected Systems
Various large language models (LLMs) are affected, including but not limited to GPT-3.5, Gemma-9B-v2, Qwen-7B-v2.5, and GPT-4o. The extent of the vulnerability depends on the specific content moderation mechanisms implemented within each LLM.
Mitigation Steps
- Implement more robust content moderation systems that incorporate techniques resilient to the types of attacks described in the paper (e.g., improved contextual analysis exceeding simple keyword detection).
- Continuously evaluate LLM safety mechanisms against both known and novel attack strategies.
- Utilize datasets like GAP-GUARDATTACKDATA for improved training and tuning of content moderation models.
- Consider incorporating advanced detection techniques beyond keyword filtering, such as analysis of prompt structure and semantic intent to mitigate these attacks.
Research context and confidence
- Evidence and verification
- Paper-reported; independent reproduction is not documented.
- Primary research source linked.
- Severity
- Not rated by this catalog.
- Source and publication type
- arXiv · Research preprint.
- Peer-review status is not provided by this source.
- Author and publication status
- Author metadata is not stored; see the primary paper.
- Threat model and attacker access
- Black-box model, service, or application access.
- Related deployment categories
- No related deployment category is classified.
- Taxonomy labels only; paper-specific deployment prerequisites are not inferred.
- Affected systems
- Various large language models (LLMs) are affected, including but not limited to GPT-3.5, Gemma-9B-v2, Qwen-7B-v2.5, and GPT-4o. The extent of the vulnerability depends on the specific content moderation mechanisms…
Research Paper
Graph of attacks with pruning: Optimizing stealthy jailbreak prompt generation for enhanced llm content moderation
Primary source: arXiv. Findings are reported by the cited research and have not been independently verified.
View PaperEvidence
This entry is based on a primary research source. Its findings are paper-reported; independent reproduction and verification are not claimed.
https://arxiv.org/abs/2501.18638Related research
- LLM Router Rerouting
Published January 1, 2026 · application-layer, prompt-layer, injection
- Ethical Dilemma Jailbreak TRIAL
Published September 1, 2025 · model-layer, prompt-layer, injection
- MDH: Hybrid Jailbreak Detection Strategy
Published August 1, 2025 · prompt-layer, application-layer, injection