Skip to main content
LLM Security Database
Skip to research details
Back to research findings

Hidden-Intent LLM Evasion

Published
Analyzed
Paper-reported evidence
Primary source linked
Read primary paper
Cite & share
Source BibTeX

Citation metadata is maintained by the primary source and may reflect a later revision.

Paper-evaluated models(4)

  • GPT-3.5 Turbo
  • GPT-4
  • Llama 2 13B
  • WizardLM 13B
On this page

Description

Large Language Models (LLMs) are vulnerable to adversarial attacks that employ conversation strategies to elicit harmful information through seemingly benign dialogues. The attack, termed "Imposter.AI," leverages three key strategies: (1) decomposing malicious questions into innocuous sub-questions; (2) rephrasing overtly malicious questions into benign-sounding alternatives; and (3) enhancing the harmfulness of responses by prompting the LLM for illustrative examples. This allows attackers to bypass safety mechanisms designed to prevent the generation of harmful content.

Examples

See paper for specific examples of prompts and responses demonstrating the attack. Examples include using innocuous sub-questions to obtain details needed for illegal activities such as creating explosives, making it harder for safety mechanisms to identify malicious intent.

Impact

Successful exploitation can lead to the generation of harmful content including instructions for illegal activities, the spreading of misinformation, or revealing sensitive information. The subtlety of the attack makes detection and mitigation challenging.

Affected Systems

Large Language Models (LLMs) such as GPT-3.5-turbo, GPT-4, and Llama2 (though Llama2 shows higher resistance). The vulnerability is likely present in other LLMs using similar safety mechanisms. The impact varies across models, with some demonstrating increased vulnerability compared to others.

Mitigation Steps

  • Implement more robust content filtering and detection mechanisms that consider the context of entire conversations rather than individual prompts.
  • Develop LLM architectures that are better at identifying and rejecting malicious intent even when masked by seemingly benign language.
  • Train LLMs on adversarial examples to improve their resistance to this type of attack.
  • Develop advanced detection mechanisms that assess the overall intent of a conversation across many turns to detect the presence of harmful intentions even when obscured by intermediate benign exchanges.

Research context and provenance

Catalog identifier
LMVD-afbef2a9
Internal research identifier, not an official CVE identifier.
Evidence and verification
Paper-reported; independent reproduction is not documented.
Primary research source linked.
Severity
Not rated by this catalog.
Source and publication type
arXiv · Research preprint.
Peer-review status is not provided by this source.
Author and publication status
Author metadata is not stored; see the primary paper.
Threat model and attacker access
Black-box model, service, or application access.
Related deployment categories
No related deployment category is classified.
Taxonomy labels only; paper-specific deployment prerequisites are not inferred.
Affected systems
Large Language Models (LLMs) such as GPT-3.5-turbo, GPT-4, and Llama2 (though Llama2 shows higher resistance). The vulnerability is likely present in other LLMs using similar safety mechanisms. The impact varies across…

Research Paper

Imposter. ai: Adversarial attacks with hidden intentions towards aligned large language models

Primary source: arXiv. Findings are reported by the cited research and have not been independently verified.

View Paper

Evidence

This entry is based on a primary research source. Its findings are paper-reported; independent reproduction and verification are not claimed.

https://arxiv.org/abs/2407.15399