Skip to main content
LLM Security Database
Skip to research details
Back to research findings
LMVD-ID: 818b44af
Paper published March 1, 2025
Entry analyzed March 19, 2025
Paper-reported evidence
Confidence: Source-linked

The LMVD-ID is an internal research identifier, not an official CVE identifier.

Improved LLM Jailbreak Transferability

Large Language Models (LLMs) employing gradient-based optimization for jailbreaking defense are vulnerable to enhanced transferability attacks due to superfluous constraints in their objective functions. Specifically…

BibTeX citation

Paper-evaluated models(8)

Gemma 7B IT, GPT-3.5 Turbo, GPT-4 Turbo +5 more
  • Gemma 7B IT
  • GPT-3.5 Turbo
  • GPT-4 Turbo
  • Llama 2 7B Chat
  • Llama 3 8B Instruct
  • Qwen 2 7B
  • Vicuna 7B v1.5
  • Yi 1.5 9B Chat

Description

Large Language Models (LLMs) employing gradient-based optimization for jailbreaking defense are vulnerable to enhanced transferability attacks due to superfluous constraints in their objective functions. Specifically, the "response pattern constraint" (forcing a specific initial response phrase) and the "token tail constraint" (penalizing variations in the response beyond a fixed prefix) limit the search space and reduce the effectiveness of attacks across different models. Removing these constraints significantly increases the success rate of attacks transferred to target models.

Examples

See the paper's GitHub repository: https://github.com/thu-coai/TransferAttack (opens in a new tab)

Impact

Successful exploitation allows attackers to bypass LLM safety mechanisms with higher success rates across a wider range of models than previously possible with gradient-based methods, leading to the generation of unsafe or malicious content. This affects the reliability of safety measures implemented in LLMs.

Affected Systems

LLMs utilizing gradient-based optimization for safety mechanisms and employing "response pattern" and "token tail" constraints in their objective functions. Specifically, the paper demonstrates this vulnerability on Llama-3-8B-Instruct, Llama-2-7B-Chat, and several other models (see paper for details).

Mitigation Steps

  • Re-evaluate the objective function used in gradient-based LLM safety mechanisms. Remove or significantly relax constraints on the response pattern beyond the essential elements needed for safety.
  • Relax or remove constraints on the “token tail,” allowing for more variability in output while maintaining core safety restrictions.
  • Develop more robust safety mechanisms that are less susceptible to manipulation via gradient-based attacks. Consider methods beyond simple token-level prediction.

Research context and confidence

Evidence and verification
Paper-reported; independent reproduction is not documented.
Primary research source linked.
Severity
Not rated by this catalog.
Source and publication type
arXiv · Research preprint.
Peer-review status is not provided by this source.
Author and publication status
Author metadata is not stored; see the primary paper.
Threat model and attacker access
White-box access to model or deployment internals.
Related deployment categories
No related deployment category is classified.
Taxonomy labels only; paper-specific deployment prerequisites are not inferred.
Affected systems
LLMs utilizing gradient-based optimization for safety mechanisms and employing "response pattern" and "token tail" constraints in their objective functions. Specifically, the paper demonstrates this vulnerability on…

Research Paper

Guiding not Forcing: Enhancing the Transferability of Jailbreaking Attacks on LLMs via Removing Superfluous Constraints

Primary source: arXiv. Findings are reported by the cited research and have not been independently verified.

View Paper

Evidence

This entry is based on a primary research source. Its findings are paper-reported; independent reproduction and verification are not claimed.

https://arxiv.org/abs/2503.01865