Skip to main content
LLM Security Database
Skip to research details
Back to research findings
LMVD-ID: 60109edb
Paper published October 1, 2023
Entry analyzed December 29, 2024
Paper-reported evidence
Confidence: Source-linked

The LMVD-ID is an internal research identifier, not an official CVE identifier.

In-Context LLM Jailbreak

Large Language Models (LLMs) are vulnerable to In-Context Attacks (ICA) and susceptible to mitigation via In-Context Defense (ICD). ICA leverages a small number of harmful demonstration examples within a prompt to…

BibTeX citation

Paper-evaluated models(7)

GPT-4 0613, Llama 2 7B Chat, Mistral-7B-v2 +4 more
  • GPT-4 0613
  • Llama 2 7B Chat
  • Mistral-7B-v2
  • Mixtral 8x7B
  • Qwen-7B-v2
  • Vicuna 13B v1.5
  • Vicuna 7B v1.5

Description

Large Language Models (LLMs) are vulnerable to In-Context Attacks (ICA) and susceptible to mitigation via In-Context Defense (ICD). ICA leverages a small number of harmful demonstration examples within a prompt to elicit harmful responses from the LLM, even if it is otherwise safety-aligned. ICD counteracts ICA by prepending safe demonstration examples to the prompt, effectively reducing the likelihood of harmful output. The effectiveness of both ICA and ICD is demonstrated across multiple LLMs.

Examples

  • ICA: A prompt containing several examples of the model generating violent content, followed by a seemingly innocuous request, will trigger the generation of violent content. See arXiv:2310.06387 (opens in a new tab) for specific examples used in the research.

  • ICD: Prepending a small number (1-2 shots) of examples where the LLM refuses to answer harmful prompts to a malicious prompt can reduce or eliminate harmful responses. See arXiv:2310.06387 (opens in a new tab) for specific examples used in the research.

Impact

Successful ICA can lead to the generation of harmful content (e.g., hate speech, instructions for illegal activities, personally identifiable information) by an LLM, bypassing existing safety mitigations. The impact depends on the LLM and the specific context; it could range from minor inconvenience to potentially serious harm (e.g., incitement to violence, spreading misinformation). ICD can significantly reduce this risk but may not be entirely effective against sophisticated attacks.

Affected Systems

Various LLMs, including open-source models (Vicuna, Llama 2, QWen) and closed-source models (GPT-4), are susceptible to this vulnerability. The specific vulnerability varies across models.

Mitigation Steps

  • Improved prompt engineering: Develop robust methods to detect and filter malicious prompts attempting to leverage ICA.
  • Enhanced model training: Incorporate adversarial training during the model's development to improve resistance to ICA.
  • In-Context Defense (ICD) implementation: Implement ICD by proactively prepending safe examples to all user prompts to mitigate potentially harmful requests. The number of safe examples necessary depends largely on the model's resilience and the sophistication of the attack.
  • Regular security audits: Conduct periodic red-teaming exercises to identify and address weaknesses in LLM safety mechanisms.

Research context and confidence

Evidence and verification
Paper-reported; independent reproduction is not documented.
Primary research source linked.
Severity
Not rated by this catalog.
Source and publication type
arXiv · Research preprint.
Peer-review status is not provided by this source.
Author and publication status
Author metadata is not stored; see the primary paper.
Threat model and attacker access
Black-box model, service, or application access.
Related deployment categories
No related deployment category is classified.
Taxonomy labels only; paper-specific deployment prerequisites are not inferred.
Affected systems
Various LLMs, including open-source models (Vicuna, Llama 2, QWen) and closed-source models (GPT-4), are susceptible to this vulnerability. The specific vulnerability varies across models.

Research Paper

Jailbreak and guard aligned language models with only few in-context demonstrations

Primary source: arXiv. Findings are reported by the cited research and have not been independently verified.

View Paper

Evidence

This entry is based on a primary research source. Its findings are paper-reported; independent reproduction and verification are not claimed.

https://arxiv.org/abs/2310.06387