Skip to main content
LLM Security Database
Skip to research details
Back to research findings
LMVD-ID: 52788a67
Paper published March 1, 2024
Entry analyzed December 28, 2024
Paper-reported evidence
Confidence: Source-linked

The LMVD-ID is an internal research identifier, not an official CVE identifier.

LLM Distraction Jailbreak

Large Language Models (LLMs) are vulnerable to a novel black-box jailbreak attack, termed "Distraction-based Adversarial Prompts" (DAP). DAP leverages the distractibility and over-confidence of LLMs by concealing…

BibTeX citation

Paper-evaluated models(7)

GPT-3.5 Turbo, GPT-3.5-1106), GPT-4 +4 more
  • GPT-3.5 Turbo
  • GPT-3.5-1106)
  • GPT-4
  • Llama 2 7B Chat
  • Llama-2-sys
  • Mistral 7B
  • Vicuna 13B v1.5

Description

Large Language Models (LLMs) are vulnerable to a novel black-box jailbreak attack, termed "Distraction-based Adversarial Prompts" (DAP). DAP leverages the distractibility and over-confidence of LLMs by concealing malicious queries within complex, unrelated prompts. A memory-reframing mechanism further redirects the LLM's attention away from the distracting context and toward the malicious query, causing the model to bypass safety mechanisms and generate harmful or unintended outputs.

Examples

Specific examples of DAP prompts and resulting harmful outputs are withheld due to responsible disclosure practices and the potential for misuse. See arXiv:2403.08424 (opens in a new tab) for details.

Impact

Successful exploitation of this vulnerability allows attackers to circumvent LLM safety features and elicit the generation of harmful content, including but not limited to: instructions for illegal activities, personally identifiable information leaks, biased or offensive statements, and potentially malicious code. The attack is effective against both open-source and proprietary LLMs, demonstrating transferability and scalability.

Affected Systems

A wide range of LLMs, including but not limited to ChatGPT (GPT-3.5 and GPT-4), Bard, Claude, LLaMA 2, and Vicuna are susceptible. The vulnerability arises from the inherent characteristics of LLM attention mechanisms and is not limited to specific model architectures or training datasets.

Mitigation Steps

  • Develop and implement more robust defense mechanisms that are resistant to distraction-based attacks. This could include improvements in attention mechanisms, context awareness during prompt processing, better identification of malicious intent, and more sophisticated filtering of output content.
  • Enhance the training of LLMs to improve resistance to adversarial prompts and reduce their susceptibility to distraction.
  • Continuous red-teaming and adversarial testing to identify and address potential vulnerabilities. Employ diverse and sophisticated attack techniques, including those that exploit LLMs' susceptibility to distraction.
  • Develop advanced detection mechanisms capable of identifying and classifying attacks that strategically incorporate distraction techniques into the prompts.

Research context and confidence

Evidence and verification
Paper-reported; independent reproduction is not documented.
Primary research source linked.
Severity
Not rated by this catalog.
Source and publication type
arXiv · Research preprint.
Peer-review status is not provided by this source.
Author and publication status
Author metadata is not stored; see the primary paper.
Threat model and attacker access
Black-box model, service, or application access.
Related deployment categories
No related deployment category is classified.
Taxonomy labels only; paper-specific deployment prerequisites are not inferred.
Affected systems
A wide range of LLMs, including but not limited to ChatGPT (GPT-3.5 and GPT-4), Bard, Claude, LLaMA 2, and Vicuna are susceptible. The vulnerability arises from the inherent characteristics of LLM attention mechanisms…

Research Paper

Tastle: Distract large language models for automatic jailbreak attack

Primary source: arXiv. Findings are reported by the cited research and have not been independently verified.

View Paper

Evidence

This entry is based on a primary research source. Its findings are paper-reported; independent reproduction and verification are not claimed.

https://arxiv.org/abs/2403.08424