The LMVD-ID is an internal research identifier, not an official CVE identifier.
Logic-Chain Jailbreak
This vulnerability allows attackers to bypass LLM safety mechanisms and elicit malicious content by injecting a chain of benign, semantically equivalent narrations into a seemingly innocuous article. The LLM connects…
Paper-evaluated models(4)
- BERT
- GPT
- GPT-4
- PaLM 2
Description
This vulnerability allows attackers to bypass LLM safety mechanisms and elicit malicious content by injecting a chain of benign, semantically equivalent narrations into a seemingly innocuous article. The LLM connects these scattered narrations, effectively executing the malicious intent hidden within the seemingly benign context. This differs from previous attacks which directly embed malicious prompts, making detection by both LLMs and human reviewers more difficult.
Examples
See paper for detailed examples of both "Paragraphed Logic Chain" and "Acrostic" style attacks. These examples demonstrate how seemingly innocuous text, when strategically structured, can be used to elicit responses that violate the LLM's safety guidelines.
Impact
Successful exploitation allows attackers to generate responses containing harmful content, bypassing LLM safety features. This could lead to the generation of instructions for illegal activities, dissemination of misinformation, or other malicious actions. The attack's subtlety makes human detection difficult, increasing its effectiveness.
Affected Systems
Large Language Models (LLMs) vulnerable to prompt injection attacks. Specifically, LLMs that rely on attention mechanisms to process text and lack sufficient defenses against cleverly crafted, distributed prompts. The specific LLMs affected may change over time due to model updates and security patches.
Mitigation Steps
- Implement more robust prompt filtering mechanisms that go beyond simple keyword detection and pattern matching.
- Develop techniques to detect and disrupt logically connected sequences of seemingly benign prompts within larger text bodies.
- Analyze the attention weights within the LLM during processing to identify unusually strong connections between seemingly unrelated parts of the input.
- Conduct adversarial training specifically targeting this type of attack.
- Implement human-in-the-loop verification for responses deemed high-risk by internal model scoring systems.
Research context and confidence
- Evidence and verification
- Paper-reported; independent reproduction is not documented.
- Primary research source linked.
- Severity
- Not rated by this catalog.
- Source and publication type
- arXiv · Research preprint.
- Peer-review status is not provided by this source.
- Author and publication status
- Author metadata is not stored; see the primary paper.
- Threat model and attacker access
- Black-box model, service, or application access.
- Related deployment categories
- No related deployment category is classified.
- Taxonomy labels only; paper-specific deployment prerequisites are not inferred.
- Affected systems
- Large Language Models (LLMs) vulnerable to prompt injection attacks. Specifically, LLMs that rely on attention mechanisms to process text and lack sufficient defenses against cleverly crafted, distributed prompts. The…
Research Paper
Hidden You Malicious Goal Into Benigh Narratives: Jailbreak Large Language Models through Logic Chain Injection
Primary source: arXiv. Findings are reported by the cited research and have not been independently verified.
View PaperEvidence
This entry is based on a primary research source. Its findings are paper-reported; independent reproduction and verification are not claimed.
https://arxiv.org/abs/2404.04849Related research
- Trojan Prompt Chains in Education
Published July 1, 2025 · prompt-layer, application-layer, injection
- LLM Router Rerouting
Published January 1, 2026 · application-layer, prompt-layer, injection
- Semantic Tool Poisoning
Published December 1, 2025 · application-layer, prompt-layer, injection