Skip to main content
LLM Security Database
Skip to research details
Back to research findings
LMVD-ID: ab3ff9d5
Paper published October 1, 2023
Entry analyzed December 29, 2024
Paper-reported evidence
Confidence: Source-linked

The LMVD-ID is an internal research identifier, not an official CVE identifier.

Low-Resource Language Jailbreak

Large Language Models (LLMs), such as GPT-4, exhibit a cross-lingual vulnerability in their safety mechanisms. Translating unsafe English prompts into low-resource languages, using readily available translation APIs…

BibTeX citation

Paper-evaluated models(1)

  • GPT-4

Description

Large Language Models (LLMs), such as GPT-4, exhibit a cross-lingual vulnerability in their safety mechanisms. Translating unsafe English prompts into low-resource languages, using readily available translation APIs like Google Translate, bypasses the LLM's safety filters and elicits harmful responses with a significantly higher success rate than attacks targeting the English language directly. The vulnerability stems from an unequal distribution of safety training data across languages, resulting in poor generalization of safety mechanisms to low-resource languages.

Examples

See the paper "Low-resource Languages Jailbreak GPT-4 (opens in a new tab)". The paper includes numerous examples demonstrating successful jailbreaks by translating English prompts into low-resource languages such as Zulu and Scots Gaelic. The translated responses, when re-translated to English, often contain coherent and actionable harmful instructions.

Impact

Attackers can easily circumvent the safety mechanisms of LLMs, leading to the generation of harmful content including instructions for creating explosives, performing illegal financial activities, spreading misinformation, and promoting violence. This risk affects a large population of low-resource language speakers directly and indirectly exposes all LLM users to harmful content via translation APIs.

Affected Systems

Large Language Models (LLMs) whose safety training data is disproportionately weighted towards high-resource languages. Specifically, the paper demonstrates the vulnerability on GPT-4 (gpt-4-0613).

Mitigation Steps

  • Increase the diversity and quantity of safety training data to include a wide range of low-resource languages.
  • Develop and implement more robust multilingual safety mechanisms that generalize effectively across various languages.
  • Regularly conduct multilingual red-teaming exercises to identify and address cross-lingual security vulnerabilities.
  • Evaluate and improve the safety of translation APIs used in conjunction with LLMs.

Research context and confidence

Evidence and verification
Paper-reported; independent reproduction is not documented.
Primary research source linked.
Severity
Not rated by this catalog.
Source and publication type
arXiv · Research preprint.
Peer-review status is not provided by this source.
Author and publication status
Author metadata is not stored; see the primary paper.
Threat model and attacker access
Black-box model, service, or application access.
Related deployment categories
No related deployment category is classified.
Taxonomy labels only; paper-specific deployment prerequisites are not inferred.
Affected systems
Large Language Models (LLMs) whose safety training data is disproportionately weighted towards high-resource languages. Specifically, the paper demonstrates the vulnerability on GPT-4 (gpt-4-0613).

Research Paper

Low-resource languages jailbreak gpt-4

Primary source: arXiv. Findings are reported by the cited research and have not been independently verified.

View Paper

Evidence

This entry is based on a primary research source. Its findings are paper-reported; independent reproduction and verification are not claimed.

https://arxiv.org/abs/2310.02446