Skip to main content
LLM Security Database
Skip to research details
Back to research findings
LMVD-ID: 75c00841
Paper published February 1, 2024
Entry analyzed December 28, 2024
Paper-reported evidence
Confidence: Source-linked

The LMVD-ID is an internal research identifier, not an official CVE identifier.

Multimodal Model Jailbreak

Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs) are vulnerable to a jailbreaking attack using crafted images (image Jailbreaking Prompts or imgJPs). These imgJPs, when presented as input alongside malicious prompts, cause the…

BibTeX citation

Paper-evaluated models(6)

InstructBLIP, MiniGPT-4, MiniGPT-v2 +3 more
  • InstructBLIP
  • MiniGPT-4
  • MiniGPT-v2
  • Mplug-owl2
  • Vicuna 13B
  • Vicuna 7B

Description

Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs) are vulnerable to a jailbreaking attack using crafted images (image Jailbreaking Prompts or imgJPs). These imgJPs, when presented as input alongside malicious prompts, cause the MLLM to bypass safety mechanisms and generate objectionable content, including instructions for harmful activities like identity theft or creation of violent video games. The attack demonstrates both prompt-universality (a single imgJP works across multiple prompts) and, to a lesser extent, image-universality (a single perturbation works across multiple images within a semantic category). The vulnerability stems from the interaction between the visual and text processing modules within the MLLM.

Examples

See the paper's Appendix for examples of imgJPs successfully eliciting objectionable outputs from various MLLMs. The examples include prompts that result in the generation of harmful content, such as instructions for creating violent video games and committing fraud.

Impact

Successful exploitation allows attackers to bypass safety filters on MLLMs, leading to the generation of harmful content, including instructions for illegal activities, hate speech, and violent content. This undermines the safety mechanisms intended to prevent misuse of these powerful models.

Affected Systems

Multiple MLLMs are affected including, but not limited to, MiniGPT-v2, LLaVA, InstructBLIP, mPLUG-Owl2, and models based on LLaMA2 and Vicuna.

Mitigation Steps

  • Improved safety mechanisms within MLLMs that are robust to visual manipulation.
  • Development of more effective detection techniques for adversarial images.
  • Further research on model architectures that are more resistant to this type of attack.
  • Increased scrutiny and testing during the development and deployment of MLLMs.

Research context and confidence

Evidence and verification
Paper-reported; independent reproduction is not documented.
Primary research source linked.
Severity
Not rated by this catalog.
Source and publication type
arXiv · Research preprint.
Peer-review status is not provided by this source.
Author and publication status
Author metadata is not stored; see the primary paper.
Threat model and attacker access
Black-box model, service, or application access.
Related deployment categories
No related deployment category is classified.
Taxonomy labels only; paper-specific deployment prerequisites are not inferred.
Affected systems
Multiple MLLMs are affected including, but not limited to, MiniGPT-v2, LLaVA, InstructBLIP, mPLUG-Owl2, and models based on LLaMA2 and Vicuna.

Research Paper

Jailbreaking attack against multimodal large language model

Primary source: arXiv. Findings are reported by the cited research and have not been independently verified.

View Paper

Evidence

This entry is based on a primary research source. Its findings are paper-reported; independent reproduction and verification are not claimed.

https://arxiv.org/abs/2402.02309