Skip to main content
LLM Security Database
Skip to research details
Back to research findings
LMVD-ID: 9127d01f
Paper published December 1, 2024
Entry analyzed December 28, 2024
Paper-reported evidence
Confidence: Source-linked

The LMVD-ID is an internal research identifier, not an official CVE identifier.

One-Step Model Jailbreak

A vulnerability in LLMs allows attackers to bypass safety mechanisms by crafting prompts that disguise malicious intent as a "defense" against harmful content. The attack, Reverse Embedded Defense Attack (REDA)…

BibTeX citation

Paper-evaluated models(6)

GLM 4 9B Chat, GPT-3.5, Llama 2 13B +3 more
  • GLM 4 9B Chat
  • GPT-3.5
  • Llama 2 13B
  • Llama 3.1 8B Instruct
  • Qwen 2 7B Instruct
  • Vicuna 13B v1.5

Description

A vulnerability in LLMs allows attackers to bypass safety mechanisms by crafting prompts that disguise malicious intent as a "defense" against harmful content. The attack, Reverse Embedded Defense Attack (REDA), leverages the model's own defensive capabilities to generate harmful outputs while masking the malicious intent within the response structure. This allows for successful jailbreaks in a single iteration, without requiring model-specific prompt engineering.

Examples

See the paper for examples of the attack vectors and generated outputs. The dataset used in the paper is also described within the paper.

Impact

Successful exploitation can lead to the generation of harmful, illegal, or unethical content by the affected LLM, bypassing its built-in safety filters. This undermines the intended safety and reliability of the model.

Affected Systems

The vulnerability impacts a wide range of LLMs, including open-source models (e.g., Vicuna-13B-v1.5-16k, Llama-3.1-8B-Instruct, Qwen2-7B-Instruct, GLM-4-9BChat) and closed-source services (e.g., ChatGPT-API, Spark-api (sparkmax), Glm-api (glm-4)). The extent of impact varies depending on the LLM's specific security implementations.

Mitigation Steps

  • Enhance prompt analysis and filtering techniques to detect disguised malicious intent, focusing on semantic analysis beyond simple keyword matching.
  • Implement more robust detection mechanisms for harmful content generation, even within seemingly benign contexts or responses.
  • Develop and incorporate strategies to identify and reject prompt structures indicative of REDA-style attacks.
  • Improve the model's ability to differentiate between genuine requests for defensive information and attempts to exploit its defensive mechanisms for malicious purposes.
  • Regularly update and test model defenses against emerging attack techniques such as REDA.

Research context and confidence

Evidence and verification
Paper-reported; independent reproduction is not documented.
Primary research source linked.
Severity
Not rated by this catalog.
Source and publication type
arXiv · Research preprint.
Peer-review status is not provided by this source.
Author and publication status
Author metadata is not stored; see the primary paper.
Threat model and attacker access
Black-box model, service, or application access.
Related deployment categories
No related deployment category is classified.
Taxonomy labels only; paper-specific deployment prerequisites are not inferred.
Affected systems
The vulnerability impacts a wide range of LLMs, including open-source models (e.g., Vicuna-13B-v1.5-16k, Llama-3.1-8B-Instruct, Qwen2-7B-Instruct, GLM-4-9BChat) and closed-source services (e.g., ChatGPT-API, Spark-api…

Research Paper

Jailbreaking? One Step Is Enough!

Primary source: arXiv. Findings are reported by the cited research and have not been independently verified.

View Paper

Evidence

This entry is based on a primary research source. Its findings are paper-reported; independent reproduction and verification are not claimed.

https://arxiv.org/abs/2412.12621