Skip to main content
LLM Security Database
Skip to research details
Back to research findings
LMVD-ID: 9ea81b2c
Paper published November 1, 2024
Entry analyzed January 26, 2025
Paper-reported evidence
Confidence: Source-linked

The LMVD-ID is an internal research identifier, not an official CVE identifier.

Sequential Prompt Jailbreak

Large Language Models (LLMs) are vulnerable to "SequentialBreak," a jailbreak attack where embedding a harmful prompt within a chain of benign prompts in a single query can bypass LLM safety features. The LLM's…

BibTeX citation

Paper-evaluated models

No paper-evaluated models are recorded for this entry.

Description

Large Language Models (LLMs) are vulnerable to "SequentialBreak," a jailbreak attack where embedding a harmful prompt within a chain of benign prompts in a single query can bypass LLM safety features. The LLM's attention mechanism prioritizes the benign prompts, allowing the harmful prompt to be processed without triggering safety mitigations.

Examples

See the GitHub repository https://anonymous.4open.science/r/JailBreakAttack-4F3B/ (opens in a new tab) for detailed examples of "Question Bank," "Dialog Completion," and "Game Environment" attack scenarios, including specific prompt chains and resulting harmful outputs.

Impact

Successful exploitation allows attackers to bypass LLM safety mechanisms and elicit harmful or malicious responses, including but not limited to instructions for creating harmful devices, generating hate speech, or providing guidance on illegal activities. This undermines the intended safety features of LLMs and poses significant risks to users and society.

Affected Systems

All LLMs that utilize an attention mechanism and rely on current safety features are potentially vulnerable. This includes both open-source (e.g., Llama 2, Llama 3, Gemma 2, Vicuna) and closed-source (e.g., GPT-3.5, GPT-4) models.

Mitigation Steps

  • Implement more robust prompt filtering mechanisms capable of detecting harmful content within complex sequential prompts.
  • Develop improved attention mechanisms that can better identify and prioritize potentially harmful prompts regardless of surrounding context.
  • Enhance LLM safety training data to include examples of sequential jailbreak attempts, improving the model's ability to recognize and reject such attacks.
  • Explore the use of multiple independent safety checks on the same prompt, each with different methods to detect harmful content.

Research context and confidence

Evidence and verification
Paper-reported; independent reproduction is not documented.
Primary research source linked.
Severity
Not rated by this catalog.
Source and publication type
arXiv · Research preprint.
Peer-review status is not provided by this source.
Author and publication status
Author metadata is not stored; see the primary paper.
Threat model and attacker access
Black-box model, service, or application access.
Related deployment categories
No related deployment category is classified.
Taxonomy labels only; paper-specific deployment prerequisites are not inferred.
Affected systems
All LLMs that utilize an attention mechanism and rely on current safety features are potentially vulnerable. This includes both open-source (e.g., Llama 2, Llama 3, Gemma 2, Vicuna) and closed-source (e.g., GPT-3.5…

Research Paper

SequentialBreak: Large Language Models Can be Fooled by Embedding Jailbreak Prompts into Sequential Prompt Chains

Primary source: arXiv. Findings are reported by the cited research and have not been independently verified.

View Paper

Evidence

This entry is based on a primary research source. Its findings are paper-reported; independent reproduction and verification are not claimed.

https://arxiv.org/abs/2411.06426