Skip to main content
LLM Security Database
Skip to research details
Back to research findings
LMVD-ID: 504f6b45
Paper published May 1, 2025
Entry analyzed May 31, 2025
Paper-reported evidence
Confidence: Source-linked

The LMVD-ID is an internal research identifier, not an official CVE identifier.

Single-Query LLM Jailbreak

Large Language Models (LLMs) are vulnerable to a novel jailbreak attack, termed ICE (Intent Concealment and Diversion), which leverages hierarchical prompt decomposition and semantic expansion to bypass safety filters…

BibTeX citation

Paper-evaluated models(9)

Claude 1, Claude 2, ERNIE 3.5 Turbo +6 more
  • Claude 1
  • Claude 2
  • ERNIE 3.5 Turbo
  • GPT-3.5 Turbo
  • GPT-4
  • Llama 2 13B Chat
  • Llama 3 70B
  • Llama 3.1 405B
  • Qwen Max

Description

Large Language Models (LLMs) are vulnerable to a novel jailbreak attack, termed ICE (Intent Concealment and Diversion), which leverages hierarchical prompt decomposition and semantic expansion to bypass safety filters. ICE achieves high attack success rates with single queries, exploiting the models' limitations in multi-step reasoning.

Examples

See "Exploring Jailbreak Attacks on LLMs through Intent Concealment and Diversion (opens in a new tab)" for detailed examples and methodology demonstrating ICE's ability to generate harmful outputs from seemingly innocuous prompts.

Impact

Successful exploitation of this vulnerability allows attackers to circumvent LLM safety mechanisms, generating harmful or inappropriate content such as instructions for illicit activities, hate speech, and malware. This undermines the trustworthiness and safety of LLM applications.

Affected Systems

The vulnerability affects instruction-aligned LLMs, including but not limited to GPT-3.5, GPT-4, Claude-1, Claude-2, Llama2, Claude-3, LLaMA3, LLaMA3.1, ERNIE-3.5, and Qwen-max. The specific affected versions are those released between 2023Q4 and 2024Q2, and potentially later versions unless mitigated. The vulnerability's impact varies depending on the specific model and its safety mechanisms.

Mitigation Steps

  • Implement robust, multi-layered safety mechanisms that go beyond simple keyword filtering.
  • Develop defenses that incorporate semantic analysis and contextual understanding to detect sophisticated evasion techniques.
  • Regularly update and improve LLM safety filters based on emerging attack techniques like ICE.
  • Consider incorporating real-time semantic decomposition and contextual behavior modeling as a dynamic defense measure.
  • Adopt a hybrid security strategy combining predefined security mechanisms with real-time semantic decomposition to enhance the security of LLMs.

Research context and confidence

Evidence and verification
Paper-reported; independent reproduction is not documented.
Primary research source linked.
Severity
Not rated by this catalog.
Source and publication type
arXiv · Research preprint.
Peer-review status is not provided by this source.
Author and publication status
Author metadata is not stored; see the primary paper.
Threat model and attacker access
Black-box model, service, or application access.
Related deployment categories
No related deployment category is classified.
Taxonomy labels only; paper-specific deployment prerequisites are not inferred.
Affected systems
The vulnerability affects instruction-aligned LLMs, including but not limited to GPT-3.5, GPT-4, Claude-1, Claude-2, Llama2, Claude-3, LLaMA3, LLaMA3.1, ERNIE-3.5, and Qwen-max. The specific affected versions are those…

Research Paper

Exploring Jailbreak Attacks on LLMs through Intent Concealment and Diversion

Primary source: arXiv. Findings are reported by the cited research and have not been independently verified.

View Paper

Evidence

This entry is based on a primary research source. Its findings are paper-reported; independent reproduction and verification are not claimed.

https://arxiv.org/abs/2505.14316