Skip to main content
LLM Security Database
Skip to research details
Back to research findings
LMVD-ID: 91df60d8
Paper published July 1, 2025
Entry analyzed July 14, 2025
Paper-reported evidence
Confidence: Source-linked

The LMVD-ID is an internal research identifier, not an official CVE identifier.

Activation Steering Leaks PII

Large Language Models (LLMs) are vulnerable to activation steering attacks that bypass safety and privacy mechanisms. By manipulating internal attention head activations using lightweight linear probes trained on…

BibTeX citation

Paper-evaluated models(7)

Gemma 2 9B, GLM 9B, GPT-4 +4 more
  • Gemma 2 9B
  • GLM 9B
  • GPT-4
  • GPT-4o Mini
  • Llama 2 7B
  • Llama 7B
  • Qwen 7B

Description

Large Language Models (LLMs) are vulnerable to activation steering attacks that bypass safety and privacy mechanisms. By manipulating internal attention head activations using lightweight linear probes trained on refusal/disclosure behavior, an attacker can induce the model to reveal Personally Identifiable Information (PII) memorized during training, including sensitive attributes like sexual orientation, relationships, and life events. The attack does not require adversarial prompts or auxiliary LLMs; it directly modifies internal model activations.

Examples

See paper. The paper includes examples of prompts and corresponding LLMs outputs with and without activation steering, demonstrating the information leakage.

Impact

Unauthorized disclosure of sensitive PII about individuals, potentially leading to reputational damage, identity theft, blackmail, and other privacy violations. The high success rate (at least 95% in some cases) highlights the severity.

Affected Systems

Large Language Models (LLMs) employing self-attention mechanisms and susceptible to activation steering, including those with alignment mechanisms intended to prevent disclosure of PII. Specific examples from the paper are LLaMa7B, Qwen7B, Gemma9B, and GLM9B.

Mitigation Steps

  • Develop more robust methods for preventing activation steering attacks.
  • Improve privacy-preserving training techniques to minimize memorization of sensitive PII.
  • Implement stronger internal model safeguards against unauthorized activation manipulation.
  • Conduct more rigorous privacy testing and evaluation employing techniques like activation steering.

Research context and confidence

Evidence and verification
Paper-reported; independent reproduction is not documented.
Primary research source linked.
Severity
Not rated by this catalog.
Source and publication type
arXiv · Research preprint.
Peer-review status is not provided by this source.
Author and publication status
Author metadata is not stored; see the primary paper.
Threat model and attacker access
Black-box model, service, or application access.
Related deployment categories
No related deployment category is classified.
Taxonomy labels only; paper-specific deployment prerequisites are not inferred.
Affected systems
Large Language Models (LLMs) employing self-attention mechanisms and susceptible to activation steering, including those with alignment mechanisms intended to prevent disclosure of PII. Specific examples from the paper…

Research Paper

PII Jailbreaking in LLMs via Activation Steering Reveals Personal Information Leakage

Primary source: arXiv. Findings are reported by the cited research and have not been independently verified.

View Paper

Evidence

This entry is based on a primary research source. Its findings are paper-reported; independent reproduction and verification are not claimed.

https://arxiv.org/abs/2507.02332