Skip to main content
LLM Security Database
Skip to research details
Back to research findings
LMVD-ID: b172588d
Paper published March 1, 2025
Entry analyzed March 19, 2025
Paper-reported evidence
Confidence: Source-linked

The LMVD-ID is an internal research identifier, not an official CVE identifier.

LLM Fuzz-Based Jailbreak

Large Language Models (LLMs) are vulnerable to jailbreak attacks by crafted prompts that bypass safety mechanisms, causing the model to generate harmful or unethical content. This vulnerability stems from the inherent…

BibTeX citation

Paper-evaluated models(9)

DeepSeek Chat, DeepSeek R1, Gemini 1.5 Flash +6 more
  • DeepSeek Chat
  • DeepSeek R1
  • Gemini 1.5 Flash
  • Gemini 2.0 Flash
  • GPT-3.5 Turbo
  • GPT-4o
  • GPT-4o Mini
  • Llama 2 7B Chat
  • Llama 3.1 8B Instruct

Description

Large Language Models (LLMs) are vulnerable to jailbreak attacks by crafted prompts that bypass safety mechanisms, causing the model to generate harmful or unethical content. This vulnerability stems from the inherent tension between the LLM's instruction-following and safety constraints. The JBFuzz technique demonstrates the ability to efficiently and effectively discover such prompts through a fuzzing-based approach leveraging novel seed prompt templates and a synonym-based mutation strategy.

Examples

See the JBFuzz paper. Specific examples of successful jailbreak prompts generated by JBFuzz against various LLMs are detailed in the paper's experimental results section. These prompts are tailored to specific LLMs and questions.

Impact

Successful jailbreak attacks can lead to the generation of harmful content such as hate speech, misinformation, instructions for illegal activities, and malicious code. This undermines the safety and trustworthiness of LLMs and their applications.

Affected Systems

Various large language models (LLMs), including (but not limited to) those from OpenAI (GPT-3.5, GPT-4), Meta (Llama 2, Llama 3), Google (Gemini 1.5, Gemini 2.0), and DeepSeek. The vulnerability is applicable to LLMs generally which are designed to balance helpfulness and safety constraints.

Mitigation Steps

  • Improve Seed Prompt Generation: Develop techniques beyond current methods for generating diverse and effective seed prompts to prevent adversarial attacks.
  • Enhanced Safety Mechanisms: Implement more robust safety mechanisms that are resistant to both known and unknown methods of jailbreaking.
  • Continuous Red Teaming: Regularly and rigorously red team LLMs using automated and scalable techniques such as fuzzing to proactively identify and mitigate vulnerabilities.
  • Input Sanitization and Validation: Improve input validation and sanitization to detect and neutralize potentially harmful inputs.
  • Improved Output Filtering: Enhance output filtering mechanisms which can detect attempts to produce harmful outputs efficiently and accurately.
  • Model Monitoring: Implement monitoring systems to detect deviations from expected behavior.

Research context and confidence

Evidence and verification
Paper-reported; independent reproduction is not documented.
Primary research source linked.
Severity
Not rated by this catalog.
Source and publication type
arXiv · Research preprint.
Peer-review status is not provided by this source.
Author and publication status
Author metadata is not stored; see the primary paper.
Threat model and attacker access
Black-box model, service, or application access.
Related deployment categories
No related deployment category is classified.
Taxonomy labels only; paper-specific deployment prerequisites are not inferred.
Affected systems
Various large language models (LLMs), including (but not limited to) those from OpenAI (GPT-3.5, GPT-4), Meta (Llama 2, Llama 3), Google (Gemini 1.5, Gemini 2.0), and DeepSeek. The vulnerability is applicable to LLMs…

Research Paper

JBFuzz: Jailbreaking LLMs Efficiently and Effectively Using Fuzzing

Primary source: arXiv. Findings are reported by the cited research and have not been independently verified.

View Paper

Evidence

This entry is based on a primary research source. Its findings are paper-reported; independent reproduction and verification are not claimed.

https://arxiv.org/abs/2503.08990