Skip to main content
LLM Security Database
Skip to research details
Back to research findings
LMVD-ID: 1ca1263d
Paper published April 1, 2025
Entry analyzed April 12, 2025
Paper-reported evidence
Confidence: Source-linked

The LMVD-ID is an internal research identifier, not an official CVE identifier.

Multimodal Contextual Jailbreak

Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs) are vulnerable to a jailbreaking attack, dubbed PiCo, that leverages token-level typographic attacks on images embedded within code-style instructions. The attack bypasses…

BibTeX citation

Paper-evaluated models(5)

Gemini 1.0 Pro Vision, GPT-4 Turbo, GPT-4o +2 more
  • Gemini 1.0 Pro Vision
  • GPT-4 Turbo
  • GPT-4o
  • GPT-4V
  • LLaVA 1.5

Description

Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs) are vulnerable to a jailbreaking attack, dubbed PiCo, that leverages token-level typographic attacks on images embedded within code-style instructions. The attack bypasses multi-tiered defense mechanisms, including input filtering and runtime monitoring, by exploiting weaknesses in the visual modality's integration with programming contexts. Harmful intent is concealed within visually benign image fragments and code instructions, circumventing safety protocols.

Examples

See arXiv:2504.01444 (opens in a new tab) for specific image-based examples and details on generating images with typographically altered words.

Impact

Successful exploitation allows attackers to bypass safety protocols and elicit harmful or unsafe responses from the MLLM, including but not limited to generating content related to violence, financial crime, privacy violation, animal abuse, and self-harm. The attack's success rate varies across models but is shown to be significant in many cases.

Affected Systems

Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs), including but not limited to Gemini Pro Vision, GPT-4V, GPT-4o, GPT-4-Turbo, and LLAVA-1.5. The attack is effective against both open-source and closed-source models.

Mitigation Steps

  • Enhance input filtering to detect typographical attacks on images, potentially utilizing techniques beyond simple keyword matching.
  • Improve runtime monitoring to detect malicious intent embedded within seemingly benign code instructions.
  • Develop more robust defenses against cross-modal attacks, considering the interaction between visual and textual inputs.
  • Conduct comprehensive red-teaming exercises to identify and address vulnerabilities in MLLM defenses.

Research context and confidence

Evidence and verification
Paper-reported; independent reproduction is not documented.
Primary research source linked.
Severity
Not rated by this catalog.
Source and publication type
arXiv · Research preprint.
Peer-review status is not provided by this source.
Author and publication status
Author metadata is not stored; see the primary paper.
Threat model and attacker access
Black-box model, service, or application access.
Related deployment categories
No related deployment category is classified.
Taxonomy labels only; paper-specific deployment prerequisites are not inferred.
Affected systems
Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs), including but not limited to Gemini Pro Vision, GPT-4V, GPT-4o, GPT-4-Turbo, and LLAVA-1.5. The attack is effective against both open-source and closed-source models.

Research Paper

PiCo: Jailbreaking Multimodal Large Language Models via Pictorial Code Contextualization

Primary source: arXiv. Findings are reported by the cited research and have not been independently verified.

View Paper

Evidence

This entry is based on a primary research source. Its findings are paper-reported; independent reproduction and verification are not claimed.

https://arxiv.org/abs/2504.01444