Skip to main content
LLM Security Database
Skip to research details
Back to research findings
LMVD-ID: 1e21c463
Paper published August 1, 2024
Entry analyzed July 14, 2025
Paper-reported evidence
Confidence: Source-linked

The LMVD-ID is an internal research identifier, not an official CVE identifier.

Synthetic LLM Jailbreak Dataset

Large Language Models (LLMs) are vulnerable to jailbreaking attacks leveraging synthetically generated prompts. A novel pipeline, SAGE-RT, generates a diverse dataset of 51,000 prompt-response pairs designed to exploit…

BibTeX citation

Paper-evaluated models(11)

Claude 3.5 Sonnet, Gemma 7B IT, GPT-3.5 Turbo +8 more
  • Claude 3.5 Sonnet
  • Gemma 7B IT
  • GPT-3.5 Turbo
  • GPT-4
  • GPT-4 Turbo
  • GPT-4o
  • Llama 2 70B Chat
  • Llama 2 7B Chat
  • Llama 3 70B Instruct
  • Llama 3 8B Instruct
  • Mistral 7B Instruct

Description

Large Language Models (LLMs) are vulnerable to jailbreaking attacks leveraging synthetically generated prompts. A novel pipeline, SAGE-RT, generates a diverse dataset of 51,000 prompt-response pairs designed to exploit LLMs' vulnerabilities across various categories of harmfulness. These prompts successfully jailbreak state-of-the-art LLMs in a significant percentage of tested sub-categories, including 100% of macro-categories for certain models like GPT-4 and GPT-3.5-turbo. The vulnerability stems from the LLMs' inability to consistently resist these synthetically crafted adversarial prompts, leading to the generation of unsafe or unethical content.

Examples

See the paper arXiv:2408.11851 (opens in a new tab) for specific examples of SAGE-RT generated prompts. The paper includes examples demonstrating 100% attack success rate across macro-categories for certain models, and high success rates in sub-categories.

Impact

Successful exploitation of this vulnerability allows attackers to bypass safety mechanisms implemented in LLMs, leading to the generation of harmful, unethical, or illegal content. This includes but is not limited to: generation of instructions for illegal activities, dissemination of hate speech, creation of malicious code, and the spread of misinformation. The impact can range from reputational damage for the LLM provider to real-world harm caused by the generated content.

Affected Systems

Large language models (LLMs) from various providers, including but not limited to, those evaluated in the SAGE-RT paper (e.g., GPT-4, GPT-3.5-turbo, Llama-3, Mistral). The vulnerability is likely present across a broad range of LLMs due to the underlying architectural similarities and training paradigms.

Mitigation Steps

  • Improve LLM training data to include more diverse and nuanced examples of adversarial prompts.
  • Develop more robust safety mechanisms that effectively detect and mitigate synthetically generated attacks such as those produced by SAGE-RT.
  • Implement stronger filtering and monitoring systems to detect and prevent the dissemination of harmful content generated by LLMs.
  • Regularly conduct red-teaming exercises using diverse and adversarial prompt sets such as SAGE-RT or similar methods.

Research context and confidence

Evidence and verification
Paper-reported; independent reproduction is not documented.
Primary research source linked.
Severity
Not rated by this catalog.
Source and publication type
arXiv · Research preprint.
Peer-review status is not provided by this source.
Author and publication status
Author metadata is not stored; see the primary paper.
Threat model and attacker access
Black-box model, service, or application access.
Related deployment categories
No related deployment category is classified.
Taxonomy labels only; paper-specific deployment prerequisites are not inferred.
Affected systems
Large language models (LLMs) from various providers, including but not limited to, those evaluated in the SAGE-RT paper (e.g., GPT-4, GPT-3.5-turbo, Llama-3, Mistral). The vulnerability is likely present across a broad…

Research Paper

Sage-rt: Synthetic alignment data generation for safety evaluation and red teaming

Primary source: arXiv. Findings are reported by the cited research and have not been independently verified.

View Paper

Evidence

This entry is based on a primary research source. Its findings are paper-reported; independent reproduction and verification are not claimed.

https://arxiv.org/abs/2408.11851