Mixtral vs GPT: Run a benchmark with your own data

In this guide, we'll walk through the steps to compare three large language models (LLMs): Mixtral, GPT-4o-mini, and GPT-4o. We will use promptfoo, a command-line interface (CLI) tool, to run evaluations and compare the performance of these models based on a set of prompts and test cases.

Requirements

• promptfoo CLI installed on your system.
• Access to Replicate for Mixtral.
• Access to OpenAI for GPT-4o-mini and GPT-4o.
• API keys for Replicate (REPLICATE_API_TOKEN) and OpenAI (OPENAI_API_KEY).

Step 1: Initial Setup

Create a new directory for your comparison project and initialize it with promptfoo init.

npx promptfoo@latest init mixtral-gpt-comparison

Step 2: Configure the models

Edit your promptfooconfig.yaml to include the models you want to compare. Here's an example configuration with Mixtral, GPT-4o-mini, and GPT-4o:

providers:
  - replicate:mistralai/mixtral-8x7b-instruct-v0.1:2b56576fcfbe32fa0526897d8385dd3fb3d36ba6fd0dbe033c72886b81ade93e
  - openai:gpt-4o-mini
  - openai:gpt-4o

Set your API keys as environment variables:

export REPLICATE_API_TOKEN=your_replicate_api_token
export OPENAI_API_KEY=your_openai_api_key

info

In this example, we're using Replicate, but you can also use providers like HuggingFace, TogetherAI, etc:

- huggingface:text-generation:mistralai/Mistral-7B-Instruct-v0.1
- id: openai:chat:mistralai/Mixtral-8x7B-Instruct-v0.1
  config:
    apiBaseUrl: https://api.together.xyz/v1

Local options such as ollama, vllm, and localai also exist. See providers for all options.

Optional: Configure model parameters

Customize the behavior of each model by setting parameters such as temperature and max_tokens or max_length:

providers:
  - id: openai:gpt-4o-mini
    config:
      temperature: 0
      max_tokens: 128
  - id: openai:gpt-4o
    config:
      temperature: 0
      max_tokens: 128
  - id: replicate:mistralai/mixtral-8x7b-instruct-v0.1:2b56576fcfbe32fa0526897d8385dd3fb3d36ba6fd0dbe033c72886b81ade93e
    config:
      temperature: 0.01
      max_new_tokens: 128

Step 3: Set up your prompts

Set up the prompts that you want to run for each model. In this case, we'll just use a simple prompt, because we want to compare model performance.

prompts:
  - 'Answer this as best you can: {{query}}'

If desired, you can test multiple prompts (just add more to the list), or test different prompts for each model.

Step 4: Add test cases

Define the test cases that you want to use for the evaluation. This includes setting up variables that will be interpolated into the prompts:

tests:
  - vars:
      query: 'What is the capital of France?'
    assert:
      - type: contains
        value: 'Paris'
  - vars:
      query: 'Explain the theory of relativity.'
    assert:
      - type: contains
        value: 'Einstein'
  - vars:
      query: 'Write a poem about the sea.'
    assert:
      - type: llm-rubric
        value: 'The poem should evoke imagery such as waves or the ocean.'
  - vars:
      query: 'What are the health benefits of eating apples?'
    assert:
      - type: contains
        value: 'vitamin'
  - vars:
      query: "Translate 'Hello, how are you?' into Spanish."
    assert:
      - type: similar
        value: 'Hola, ¿cómo estás?'
  - vars:
      query: 'Output a JSON list of colors'
    assert:
      - type: is-json
      - type: latency
        threshold: 5000

Optionally, you can set up assertions to automatically assess the output for correctness.

Step 5: Run the comparison

With everything configured, run the evaluation using the promptfoo CLI:

npx promptfoo@latest eval

This command will execute each test case against each configured model and record the results.

To visualize the results, use the promptfoo viewer:

npx promptfoo@latest view

It will show results like so:

You can also output the results to a file in various formats, such as JSON, YAML, or CSV:

npx promptfoo@latest eval -o results.csv

Conclusion

The comparison will provide you with a side-by-side performance view of Mixtral, GPT-4o-mini, and GPT-4o based on your test cases. Use this data to make informed decisions about which LLM best suits your application.

Contrast this with public benchmarks from the Chatbot Arena leaderboard:

Model	Arena rating	MT-bench score
gpt-4o	1243	9.32
Mixtral-8x7b-Instruct-v0.1	1121	8.3
gpt-4o-mini	1074	8.32

While public benchmarks tell you how these models perform on generic tasks, they are no substitute for running a benchmark on your own data and use cases.

The examples above highlighted a few cases where GPT outperforms Mixtral: notably, GPT-4 was better at following JSON output instructions. But, GPT 3.5 had the highest eval score because of the latency requirements that we added to one of the test cases. Overall, the best choice is going to depend largely on the test cases that you construct and your own application constraints.